Artificial Surface Materials at Golm

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Research Question

Which artificial surface material types expanded the most and how much (in ) between 2018-2024?

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Definition

Artifical Surface Materials: Materials, that are located on the surface and are either Man-made or deliberately placed there by humans.

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Study area Campus Golm

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Workflow
  1. Preprocessing of data
  2. Create training data
  3. Classification
  4. Change detection
  5. Change analysis
07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Classes

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Datasets



07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Classification Method
  1. Read raster bands
  2. Apply PCA to reduce spectral dimensionality
  3. Rasterize training polygons into labeled pixels
  4. Extract labeled pixels as training samples
  5. Train Random Forest on labeled data
  6. Classify all pixels using trained model
  7. Validate with validation data
07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Classification Implementation
  • rasterio
  • geopandas
  • sklearn.decomposition.PCA
  • sklearn.ensemble.RandomForestClassifier
07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Classification Training Data



07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Classification Training Data



07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Classification Results



07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Classification Confusion Matrix



07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Classification Accuracy



07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Change Detection Method

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Change Detection Results

11
12
13
...
88

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Change Analysis 2018-2024

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Challenges
  • Datasets had different amount of Bands
  • Deciding on the right classes
  • Classification with Enmap Box, unsatisfactory
07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel

Thank you, for your attention!

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel
Sources

Balsamo et al. “Satellite and In Situ Observations for Advancing Global Earth Surface Modelling: A Review.” Remote Sensing 10, no. 12 (December 2018): 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10122038.

Guanter et al. “The EnMAP Spaceborne Imaging Spectroscopy Mission for Earth Observation.” Remote Sensing 7, no. 7 (July 2015): 8830–57. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70708830.

Ilehag et al. “KLUM: An Urban VNIR and SWIR Spectral Library Consisting of Building Materials.” Remote Sensing 11, no. 18 (January 2019): 2149. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182149.

Lindeni et al. “Imaging Spectroscopy of Urban Environments.” Surveys in Geophysics 40, no. 3 (May 1, 2019): 471–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9486-y.

Okujeni et al. “Support Vector Regression and Synthetically Mixed Training Data for Quantifying Urban Land Cover.” Remote Sensing of Environment 137 (October 1, 2013): 184–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.06.007.

Zhao et al. “ASI: An Artificial Surface Index for Landsat 8 Imagery.” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 107 (March 1, 2022): 102703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102703.

07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel