Files
courses/2025_Advanced_Earth_Observation/docs/slides.md
T
2025-07-30 15:57:48 +02:00

3.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

marp, theme, class, paginate, _paginate, footer
marp theme class paginate _paginate footer
true uncover invert true false 07.07.2025 / University of Potsdam / Joaquin Gottlebe, Florian Ringel

Artificial Surface Materials at Golm


Research Question

Which artificial surface material types expanded the most and how much (in m^2) between 2018-2024?


Definition

Artifical Surface Materials: Materials, that are located on the surface and are either Man-made or deliberately placed there by humans.


Study area Campus Golm

w:550


Workflow
  1. Preprocessing of data
  2. Create training data
  3. Classification
  4. Change detection
  5. Change analysis

Classes

w:600


Datasets

100% bg 100% bg 100%


Classification Method
  1. Read raster bands
  2. Apply PCA to reduce spectral dimensionality
  3. Rasterize training polygons into labeled pixels
  4. Extract labeled pixels as training samples
  5. Train Random Forest on labeled data
  6. Classify all pixels using trained model
  7. Validate with validation data

Classification Implementation
  • rasterio
  • geopandas
  • sklearn.decomposition.PCA
  • sklearn.ensemble.RandomForestClassifier

Classification Training Data

100% bg 100% bg 100%


Classification Training Data

100% bg 100% bg 100%


Classification Results

100% bg 100% bg 100%


Classification Confusion Matrix

100% bg 100% bg 100%


Classification Accuracy

100% bg 100% bg 100%


Change Detection Method

\text{change\_value} = \text{old\_value} \times 10 + \text{new\_value}

Change Detection Results

11 12 13 ... 88

bg right:50% 100%


Change Analysis 2018-2024

w:750


Challenges
  • Datasets had different amount of Bands
  • Deciding on the right classes
  • Classification with Enmap Box, unsatisfactory

Thank you, for your attention!


Sources
<style scoped> section { font-size: 20px; } </style>

Balsamo et al. “Satellite and In Situ Observations for Advancing Global Earth Surface Modelling: A Review.” Remote Sensing 10, no. 12 (December 2018): 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10122038.

Guanter et al. “The EnMAP Spaceborne Imaging Spectroscopy Mission for Earth Observation.” Remote Sensing 7, no. 7 (July 2015): 8830–57. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70708830.

Ilehag et al. “KLUM: An Urban VNIR and SWIR Spectral Library Consisting of Building Materials.” Remote Sensing 11, no. 18 (January 2019): 2149. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182149.

Lindeni et al. “Imaging Spectroscopy of Urban Environments.” Surveys in Geophysics 40, no. 3 (May 1, 2019): 471–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9486-y.

Okujeni et al. “Support Vector Regression and Synthetically Mixed Training Data for Quantifying Urban Land Cover.” Remote Sensing of Environment 137 (October 1, 2013): 184–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.06.007.

Zhao et al. “ASI: An Artificial Surface Index for Landsat 8 Imagery.” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 107 (March 1, 2022): 102703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102703.